Here is the second paper, comparing Hong Kong's minimal welfare state to America's bloated one. Here's a snippet:
In the weeks leading up to Hong Kong’s handover to Chinese sovereignty, Hong Kong’s caged-home dwellers were in the spotlight. The city was flooded with foreign journalists, and the phenomenon of the city’s caged homes was at the top of their lists of things to see.
Foreign reporters streamed in and out of the city’s caged homes, and gasped in horror at the squalid accommodations of the cagemen and women. However, it seems that few bothered to investigate into the background of the caged housing. In the months leading up to the handover, welfare groups and the Hong Kong Government were swamped with requests to visit the caged people. Some caged dwellings were visited by as many as four camera crews a day as the handover drew near. Yet, when the Secretary for Housing gave a press briefing on the territory’s housing policies, only about a dozen foreign journalists showed up.
In their eagerness to seek out a “dark side” to Hong Kong’s capitalist success story, these journalists missed one important point: that the phenomenon of people living out their old age in cages is rooted not in the vagaries of Hong Kong’s capitalist system, but in a severe housing shortage caused by a long-standing government monopoly on land ownership, and early government intervention in the property market. These journalists also missed out on an even more interesting story: that in spite of a history of from zero to minimal government support for public welfare services, and in spite of the fact that less than 40 years ago well over half the population lived in abject poverty, Hong Kong has actually performed better than many western nations in the area of social welfare.
You can read the rest here.
I live and work in Hong Kong and as a westerner (originally from UK) I think that most countries during this recession should be watching their own poverty line rather than pointing out the issues in other states. Hong Kong in it's own way is a lot like London or New York it has social elite rich rubbing right up against some really poor people and the place has the same trapping too. People assume when they get their they will find a better life so people flock to where there is a chance of getting money and success rather then staying where they know they wont. The idea of people living in cages is terrible but there are homeless in all large cities who don't even have a cage, where is the welfare for them?
Posted by: lovestruck.com | April 11, 2013 at 07:31 AM
...And yes, I know, I'm veering away from my commitment to not post on political topics. One of my tasks in completing my creative projects is to get all of my old stuff up on my sites. So... I'm running into some grey areas, and I'm sure there will be more - especially as I finish up that rather political short story I've been working on.
Posted by: Bretigne | February 13, 2013 at 11:44 AM